Judiciary
Federal appeals decide, 98, plans to ‘proceed the battle’ after panel recommends continued suspension
July 29, 2025, 11:38 am CDT
Decide Pauline Newman, now age 98, of the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Could 2023. In keeping with a three-judge particular committee, Newman’s eloquent talking potential and her docs’ reviews don’t justify her refusal to undergo neuropsychological exams. (Photograph by Invoice O’Leary/The Washington Publish through Getty Photographs)
A federal appeals decide’s eloquent talking potential and her docs’ reviews don’t justify her refusal to undergo neuropsychological exams, in response to a three-judge particular committee of the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Federal Circuit Decide Pauline Newman, 98, ought to obtain a 3rd one-year suspension from listening to new circumstances, in response to the particular panel’s July 28 report and advice, which was famous by How Interesting.
Law360, Bloomberg Legislation and Reuters have protection. Extra supplies are obtainable right here.
Newman, who’s interesting dismissal of her lawsuit difficult the suspension, advised Reuters that she plans to “proceed the battle.”
“I’m involved lest these travesties of process and regulation purchase precedential pressure, inserting a cloud on any decide of divergent coverage or politics or perhaps a decide who writes dissents,” she advised Reuters.
Newman was first suspended from listening to new circumstances in September 2023 for refusing to take part in medical evaluations to find out her psychological health for the bench. The Federal Circuit’s judicial council on the time cited “overwhelming proof that Decide Newman could also be experiencing vital psychological issues, together with reminiscence loss, lack of comprehension, confusion and an incapability to carry out primary duties.”
Within the new report, the panel famous that one in every of Newman’s docs, Dr. Ted Rothstein, testified in a deposition that he had beneficial throughout an examination in July 2023 that she endure a extra detailed neuropsychological battery of exams for a definitive dedication on health for her duties.
“Years of litigating this dispute might have been prevented,” the panel mentioned, if Newman had heeded that advice.
One other physician for Newman additionally acknowledged that her examination didn’t embrace a health for obligation examination.
A 3rd physician who examined Newman mentioned a CT perfusion scan confirmed no cognitive impairment. However three specialists retained by the panel mentioned such exams will not be an accepted diagnostic method within the discipline.
The third physician additionally mentioned his skilled testimony has by no means been excluded, however that’s not true, the particular panel mentioned. His skilled testimony has been excluded by a number of courts, together with on grounds that his opinions had been too speculative and conclusory.
The panel additionally mentioned medical data produced by Newman listed reminiscence impairment on a issues listing, with out additional clarification, and that she was hospitalized twice for fainting episodes.
The medical data listing Newman’s regulation clerk as some extent of contact, a caregiver and even her “authorized guardian,” the report mentioned. The clerk arranges and attends medical visits and offers a lot of the medical historical past, even when Newman is current. That clerk relied on the Fifth Modification in response to just about each query at her deposition.
When her regulation clerk was not current, Newman wrongly advised one in every of her docs that she was not admitted to the hospital 4 months prior for a fainting episode. A yr later, she advised one other physician that she by no means had a fainting episode.
Nor was the panel impressed by movies of interviews given by Newman.
“All of this info suggesting that Decide Newman is ready to communicate eloquently in restricted situations doesn’t overcome the overwhelming proof indicating that additional neuropsychological testing is warranted,” the particular panel mentioned. “Certainly, such a capability to supply fluid speech and apparently ‘regular’ cognition is to be anticipated, even when there are related cognitive disabilities, in an individual, like Decide Newman, who is extremely educated and had a very excessive cognitive potential to start with.”
One in all Newman’s attorneys, Gregory Dolin of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonprofit public curiosity regulation agency, advised Law360 that the panel delivered its opinion simply days after listening to arguments.
“That is only a mockery of any form of due course of,” Dolin mentioned.
Write a letter to the editor, share a narrative tip or replace, or report an error.
