Extremely-processed meals (UPFs) have change into public enemy primary in vitamin debates.
From dementia to weight problems and an epidemic of “meals habit”, these factory-made merchandise, together with crisps, prepared meals, fizzy drinks and packaged snacks, are blamed for a variety of contemporary well being issues.
Story continues under this advert
Some specialists argue that they’re “particularly formulated and aggressively marketed to maximise consumption and company income”, hijacking our mind’s reward techniques to make us eat past our wants.
Policymakers have proposed daring interventions: warning labels, advertising and marketing restrictions, taxes, even outright bans close to faculties. However how a lot of this urgency is predicated on stable proof? My colleagues and I wished to step again and ask: what really makes folks like a meals? And what drives them to overeat – not simply take pleasure in it, however hold consuming after starvation has handed? We studied greater than 3,000 UK adults and their responses to over 400 on a regular basis meals. What we discovered challenges the simplistic UPF narrative and provides a extra nuanced method ahead.
Two concepts usually get blurred in vitamin discourse: liking a meals and hedonic overeating (consuming for pleasure relatively than starvation).
Liking is about style. Hedonic overeating is about persevering with to eat as a result of the meals feels good. They’re associated, however not equivalent. Many individuals like porridge however not often binge on it. Chocolate, biscuits and ice cream, alternatively, high each lists
Story continues under this advert
We performed three massive on-line research the place individuals rated images of unbranded meals parts for the way a lot they preferred them and the way probably they have been to overeat them.
The meals have been recognisable objects from a typical UK buying basket: jacket potatoes, apples, noodles, cottage pie, custard lotions – greater than 400 in whole.
We then in contrast these responses with three issues: the meals’ dietary content material (fats, sugar, fibre, power density), their classification as ultra-processed by the extensively used Nova system – a meals classification technique that teams meals by the extent and function of their processing – and the way folks perceived them (candy, fatty, processed, wholesome and so forth).
Notion energy
Some findings have been anticipated: folks preferred meals they ate usually, and calorie-dense meals have been extra more likely to result in overeating.
Story continues under this advert
However the extra stunning perception got here from the position of beliefs and perceptions. Nutrient content material mattered – folks rated high-fat, high-carb meals as extra fulfilling, and low-fibre, high-calorie meals as extra “bingeable”.
However what folks believed in regards to the meals additionally mattered, rather a lot.
Perceiving a meals as candy, fatty or extremely processed elevated the probability of overeating, no matter its precise dietary content material. Meals believed to be bitter or excessive in fibre had the alternative impact.
In a single survey, we might predict 78 per cent of the variation in folks’s probability of overeating by combining nutrient knowledge (41 per cent) with beliefs in regards to the meals and its sensory qualities (one other 38 per cent).
Story continues under this advert
Briefly: how we take into consideration meals impacts how we eat it, simply as a lot as what’s really in it.
This brings us to ultra-processed meals. Regardless of the extraordinary scrutiny, classifying a meals as “ultra-processed” added little or no to our predictive fashions.
As soon as we accounted for nutrient content material and meals perceptions, the Nova classification defined lower than 2 per cent of the variation in liking and simply 4 per cent in overeating.
That’s to not say all UPFs are innocent. Many are excessive in energy, low in fibre and straightforward to overconsume. However the UPF label is a blunt instrument. It lumps collectively sugary tender drinks with fortified cereals, protein bars with vegan meat alternate options.
Story continues under this advert
A few of these merchandise could also be much less wholesome, however others might be useful – particularly for older adults with low appetites, folks on restricted diets or these searching for handy vitamin.
The message that every one UPFs are unhealthy oversimplifies the difficulty. Individuals don’t eat primarily based on meals labels alone. They eat primarily based on how a meals tastes, the way it makes them really feel and the way it suits with their well being, social or emotional targets.
Counting on UPF labels to form coverage might backfire. Warning labels may steer folks away from meals which can be really useful, like wholegrain cereals, or create confusion about what’s genuinely unhealthy.
As a substitute, we advocate a extra knowledgeable, personalised strategy:
• Enhance meals literacy: assist folks perceive what makes meals satisfying, what drives cravings, and the right way to recognise their private cues for overeating.
Story continues under this advert
• Reformulate with intention: design meals merchandise which can be fulfilling and filling, relatively than counting on bland “weight loss program” choices or ultra-palatable snacks.
• Tackle consuming motivations: folks eat for a lot of causes past starvation – for consolation, connection and pleasure. Supporting various habits whereas maximising enjoyment might cut back dependence on low-quality meals.
It’s not nearly processing
Some UPFs do deserve concern. They’re calorie dense, aggressively marketed and infrequently offered in outsized parts. However they’re not a smoking gun.
Labelling complete classes of meals as unhealthy primarily based purely on their processing misses the complexity of consuming behaviour. What drives us to eat and overeat is difficult however not past understanding.
Story continues under this advert
We now have the info and fashions to unpack these motivations and help folks in constructing more healthy, extra satisfying diets.
Finally, the dietary and sensory traits of meals – and the way we understand them – matter greater than whether or not one thing got here out of a packet. If we need to encourage higher consuming habits, it’s time to cease demonising meals teams and begin specializing in the psychology behind our decisions.
