Google moved to exclude professional testimony as inadmissible, arguing the U.S. Division of Justice’s key witness “lacks the related expertise to offer such opinions” on the feasibility of a compelled divestiture in Google’s advert tech treatments trial within the U.S. District Court docket for the Japanese District of Virginia.
Trending
- Announcing The National Law Journal Awards 2025 Finalists and Honorees
- Adding AI Skills to Your Resume Can Boost Your Salary: Study
- The New York Times Is Sunsetting Its Audio App
- From Richard Gere to Alia Bhatt: A look at some iconic fashion moments that defined Giorgio Armani’s legacy | Fashion News
- ‘Strapped’ former BigLaw associate is arrested for alleged confrontation with National Guard members
- 7 Steps to De-Risking Big Business Decisions Before They Backfire
- WBZ in Boston Names Rob Cartwright VP of News
- ‘Bahaut hi bada mandir main sambhaal nahi pati…’: Inside Bharti Singh and Haarsh Limbachiya’s 2BHK Mumbai home | Lifestyle News