Robinhood filed swimsuit towards Massachusetts regulators on Monday, claiming the state couldn’t take into account its “occasion contracts” to be unlawful sports-betting. The monetary companies firm argued that the follow is preempted by federal legislation and that the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC) has “unique jurisdiction” over transactions involving occasion contracts. The swimsuit names Massachusetts Lawyer Normal Andrea Pleasure Campbell, the Massachusetts Gaming Fee and a number of of its commissioners as defendants.
Trending
- ‘My Hb1AC test is 10.5 per cent. Is medication necessary, or can I fix it with diet and lifestyle?’ | Health News
- How Willkie Is Rebuilding Its German Platform Into a National Powerhouse
- LinkedIn Adds Duolingo Scores on Profiles, AI Job Interview Simulations
- Zareen Khan on life, entrepreneurship, and fitness: ‘I was an obese teenager, weighing over 100 kg’ | Lifestyle News
- As Competitors Eye Cadwalader For Talent, Law Firm ‘Not Engaged’ in Merger Talks
- Meta Showcases New AI Glasses, VR Upgrades, at Connect 2025
- Brotherhood in Big Law: How Black Male Attorneys in D.C. Built Their Own Network
- Inside the Dual Lawsuits Threatening to Unravel Group Black