Insurer Had Duty to Defend in $78 Million Case

“As a result of the data out there to Evanston when it refused to defend confirmed at the very least a chance of protection, and since there is no such thing as a dispute that Evanston declined to defend the Named Insureds, the Court docket grants the Borjas’s movement for abstract judgment that Evanston had and breached its obligation to defend,” the courtroom dominated.