Riley Brennan
“The corporate’s information of Vincer’s protected exercise, coupled with a change in its response to Vincer’s problematic habits mere days after the protected exercise, and the absence of any investigation, evaluation, or documentation in his personnel file to in any other case clarify the termination, constitutes substantial circumstantial proof that the protected exercise was no less than a motivating think about Vincer’s termination,” mentioned Decide Theodore A. McKee, who authored the opinion.
