“We’re happy that the appellate court docket agreed with us that the Residents Participation Act was meant as a defend for good religion participation within the political course of, and shouldn’t be weaponized to allow dangerous religion, politically motivated, and false allegations of wrongdoing towards our heroic lecturers freed from penalties,” Sheryl Weikal stated on behalf of the plaintiff.
Trending
- How One Man Conquered the World’s Toughest Peaks — and Built a Brand Every Founder Should Study
- Fox Weather Gets a Brand Refresh Ahead of Fourth Anniversary
- 5 style icons from Indian television whose wardrobe you could steal from even now | Fashion News
- Trump’s plan to penalize states using cashless bail is unconstitutional and unnecessary, critics say
- Want to Sell More? Make Your Team Less Competitive, Not More
- Coca-Cola Claimed Christmas. Now Fanta Wants Halloween.
- An internal medicine doctor explains why you might feel sleepy on the couch but not in bed | Lifestyle News
- Is Costco Open on Labor Day? What’s Closed on Monday?
Thursday, August 28
State Appellate Court Reinstates Teacher's Lawsuit Over Political Divide on Social Media
