“We’re happy that the appellate court docket agreed with us that the Residents Participation Act was meant as a defend for good religion participation within the political course of, and shouldn’t be weaponized to allow dangerous religion, politically motivated, and false allegations of wrongdoing towards our heroic lecturers freed from penalties,” Sheryl Weikal stated on behalf of the plaintiff.
Trending
- Should you get your pet sterilised? | Pets-animals News
- Whistleblower Complaint Leads to Awkward Disclosure for PetMed Express
- ‘Ozempic liya hai toh kya hua, ek zindagi jeeni hai…’: Ram Kapoor shares his controversial stance on weight loss medications | Health News
- Supreme Court Will Weigh Validity of Bans on Transgender Student-Athletes Competing
- This is what happens to the body if you start your day with two figs soaked overnight | Health News
- 5 Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me Before I Became a CEO
- How to Build a Side Hustle That Stands on Its Own — Without Burning Out
- Trainer hails Farhan Akhtar’s commitment, says actor took on ‘one of the most demanding transformations in Bollywood history’ for Toofan | Fitness News