“We proceed to imagine that the decision in opposition to the hospital is legally unsupported as a result of Pennsylvania legislation doesn’t acknowledge ‘group legal responsibility’ and as a substitute requires that vicarious legal responsibility be based mostly on the negligent acts of a particularly recognized agent,” Maureen McBride, representing HUP, asserted.
Trending
- ABC News to Launch New Show Exclusively for Disney+
- What’s to Become of Alina Habba? Judges to Weigh U.S. Attorney’s Future
- The Dangers of Being Too Attached to Your Business
- Netflix-Acquired Blindspot Tops the Chart
- Two Nominated to Massachusetts Superior Court Bench
- Here’s the Strategy Smart Leaders Use to Outpace Disruption
- President Donald Trump Comments on Cancellation of CBS’s The Late Show
- Say Hello to Glass Skin With the 6th Edition of Amazon’s The Beauty Sale Live from 18th-22nd July | Sponsored-lifestyle News
Friday, July 18
Superior Court Upholds $207.6M Birth Injury Judgment Against Penn Hospital
