Two judges within the Northern District of California not too long ago issued groundbreaking abstract judgment rulings concerning whether or not a synthetic intelligence firm’s scraping and ingestion of copyrighted works to coach its LLMs certified as honest use. Each choices carry probably seismic significance for AI firms and mental property litigators.
Trending
- Lakme Fashion Week 2025 highlights: Mrunal Thakur stuns in gold, Tabu exudes bridal grace, Vaani Kapoor turns muse | Fashion News
- Vitamin B3 supplement may reduce your risk of skin cancer | Health News
- ‘My dream for mental health in India is what Gully cricket is to India’: Deepika Padukone details the initial struggles of advocating for mental health | Feelings News
- Not all headaches are bad — here’s when they become a red flag | Health News
- ‘Just had a birthday. Don’t love the number, but…’: How 61-year-old F.R.I.E.N.D.S star Courteney Cox is ageing so gracefully | Fitness News
- ORS vs Coconut water: Which is the better option to tackle dehydration? | Health News
- Silk, Soul, and the Seam of Time: Tarun Tahiliani’s Tasva for the Modern Maharaja | Fashion News
- News of a ‘giant’ baby boy is all over TikTok. Here’s what women really need to know | Health News
Sunday, October 12
AI and the Fair Use Defense: Lessons from Two Recent Summary Judgment Rulings
