“We’re disenchanted by the truth that the town of Chicago has been on autopilot and has refused each alternative to interact in any settlement discussions—they haven’t even tried to supply any compensation to Mrs. Vaughn Harrell’s household. It seems to be a significant miscalculation for the town of Chicago to hunt a brand new trial on this case and expose its taxpayers to a different important judgment in a case the place the lack of harmless human life was preventable,” stated the plaintiff’s legal professional, Boris G. Samovalov of Zane D. Smith & Associates in Chicago.
Trending
- Judge Grants DOJ's Request to Argue Against Dismissal of Sugar Antitrust Actions
- Most Founders Start With the Product. I Started With These 3 Questions Instead.
- Google Says GSC Sitemap Uploads Don’t Guarantee Immediate Crawls
- News Networks Provide Coverage of the Minneapolis School Shooting
- From “Trial and Error” to Results—An Associate’s View of Her AI-Powered Law Firm
- The FTC is Shaking Up Employment Law — Here’s How Entrepreneurs Can Adapt
- Meet the Brands Partnering With The Summer I Turned Pretty to Reach Gen Z
- Email Marketing Strategy Guide: B2B, B2C and Enterprise