Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
Oftentimes, two co-founders assume it’s a good suggestion to share CEO obligations as co-CEOs. The logic is that they will separate their roles and obligations, with one particular person main sure departments (e.g., gross sales and advertising) and the opposite particular person main different departments (e.g., expertise and operations). The fact is, it is a fairly dangerous thought.
The enterprise ought to solely have one chief at a time who can “lead the ship” and ensure all the pieces is completely coordinated throughout the complete firm. This text will educate you the potential pitfalls of a co-CEO technique.
Associated: 6 Methods to Efficiently Run Your Firm With a Co-President
Lack of a sole imaginative and prescient/management
Anytime you add further individuals to a decision-making course of, that’s most actually going to contain you making some type of compromise, the place you aren’t doing precisely what you’ll have performed for those who have been a stand-alone CEO.
On minor factors, it in all probability would not matter. But when it can be crucial strategic-level factors you might be compromising, you find yourself diluting your individual private instincts and convictions. And it’s those self same instincts and convictions which can be usually the distinction between good outcomes and common outcomes. You by no means need to be able of “managing in the direction of the joyful middle-ground.”
Lack of 1 sole voice inside the staff
When there are two leaders, and people persons are not essentially in 100% alignment on the imaginative and prescient, they could be saying conflicting issues to the staff by way of the instructions they’re offering to the employees. That may create plenty of confusion amongst staff members, as they’re unclear on whose voice to hearken to probably the most, as they’re each co-CEOs. And worse, it makes it seem like the co-CEOs usually are not in alignment and usually are not speaking effectively with one another, which makes the staff nervous that management on the high would not know what they’re doing.
Lack of a tie-breaker
What occurs when the 2 co-CEOs can not agree on a subject? There is no such thing as a one there to interrupt the tie. Which both creates a stage of paralysis the place no choice will get made and the work would not get performed in any respect. Or, it requires one of many co-CEOs to again down and comply with the opposite CEO (normally with the louder voice and persona profitable). And that may create resentment in the direction of the opposite one who is continually not getting their opinions listened to or acted upon.
Associated: The Execs and Cons of the Co-CEO Mannequin
Totally different administration types might trigger friction
No two persons are precisely the identical; what occurs when there are philosophical-level variations in administration strategy? For instance one of many co-CEOs is a “top-down” strategic stage thinker who likes to “see the massive image forest,” and the opposite co-CEO is a “bottom-up” execution stage thinker who likes to “dwell within the timber.”
These two types are utterly other ways to make selections and may simply “ruffle the feathers” of the 2 co-CEOs over time, forcing them to assume and act in methods that aren’t their choice.
You lose management of half of the enterprise
In case you are the “Gross sales & Advertising and marketing” main co-CEO, that does not imply you do not have opinions on how “Expertise & Operations” is being run by the opposite co-CEO. However by dividing up the obligations, you might be principally handing off all selections in these different departments to the opposite co-CEO. When you belief the opposite particular person to function alone of their silo, that’s fantastic.
However what occurs when you have got a basic disagreement on how these different departments are being operated? You may talk that to your co-CEO to attempt to repair it, however it’s in the end as much as them to make the specified modifications you need, which they could or might not do.
Your co-CEO refuses to remain “of their swim lane”
Although you might have divided up the administration obligations together with your co-CEO, that does not imply they are going to at all times keep of their “swim lane.” CEOs who like to guide and management sometimes have a very arduous time giving up management to anybody else.
And when that “likes to regulate” co-CEO, begins drifting into the “swim lane” of their different co-CEO, having to have enter on each choice of their departments, that can actually piss off the co-CEO. At that time, you do not actually have a co-CEO construction in any respect, with one particular person needing to regulate all selections. That can find yourself very badly.
Associated: 4 Issues Profitable Leaders Know About Their Enterprise
Limits your exit choices
When it comes time to promote your corporation, the brand new purchaser would like to have one CEO be their sole choice maker, who sits on their board and works with the traders. Additionally, if you end up able to promote, your co-CEO might not be able to promote.
Now, you might be caught proudly owning and dealing in a enterprise that you simply not need to be working in. Or worse, you miss “your open window” to promote, and market circumstances change by the point your co-CEO is lastly able to promote, however now the window has closed, and you’ll’t promote.
You by no means need to be in a scenario when you possibly can’t get an exit to your fairness, handcuffed by a co-CEO’s opinion, once you see an exit as the proper path ahead.
Closing ideas
Hopefully, you now have a greater understanding of the challenges at hand if you end up contemplating a co-CEO setup for your corporation. There are examples the place co-CEOs have labored collectively completely — consider the Google founders (Sergey Brin and Larry Web page).
However most of the time, it finally ends up not understanding very effectively in any respect — assume the Salesforce executives (Marc Benioff first with Keith Block after which with Bret Taylor). So, in case you are contemplating this co-CEO path, purchaser beware, as it’s ripe with potential pitfalls and almost definitely is not going to find yourself working effectively for the co-CEOs, the employees or your traders.
Oftentimes, two co-founders assume it’s a good suggestion to share CEO obligations as co-CEOs. The logic is that they will separate their roles and obligations, with one particular person main sure departments (e.g., gross sales and advertising) and the opposite particular person main different departments (e.g., expertise and operations). The fact is, it is a fairly dangerous thought.
The enterprise ought to solely have one chief at a time who can “lead the ship” and ensure all the pieces is completely coordinated throughout the complete firm. This text will educate you the potential pitfalls of a co-CEO technique.
Associated: 6 Methods to Efficiently Run Your Firm With a Co-President
The remainder of this text is locked.
Be part of Entrepreneur+ as we speak for entry.
