Regulation Corporations
Davis Polk affiliate says he was fired after refusing to cease publishing columns on authorized points
July 17, 2025, 11:56 am CDT
A Davis Polk affiliate says he was fired 4 hours after presenting the regulation agency with a column he meant to publish on the Trump administration’s means to trace protesters.
Ryan W. Powers says he wrote the column on June 12, the day after he was informed his earlier newspaper columns on authorized points violated an inside coverage on the regulation agency. The coverage apparently gave the regulation agency huge discretion to dam worker speech on subjects it considered as related to its pursuits, he says.
Powers defined what occurred in a Substack article and a podcast referred to as the Parnas Perspective. Bloomberg Regulation and Law360 have protection.
Powers began writing columns for native newspapers after the Trump administration cracked down on the authorized career with government orders concentrating on disfavored regulation corporations and strain on bar associations to vary insurance policies.
“So, I began writing—alone time, utterly exterior of labor,” Powers wrote. “If the regulation was changing into more durable to belief, I figured it ought to at the least be simpler to grasp.”
When he was warned in regards to the regulation agency’s publishing coverage, Powers wrote, “No clarification was given—solely that one thing had been flagged, and I used to be anticipated to cease. I refused.”
Powers acquired the warning after writing one other column on privateness points. It involved the risks of unchecked federal surveillance and the way firms like Palantir Applied sciences had constructed instruments that could possibly be used to profile and monitor People. Two weeks later, the New York Instances reported that at the least 4 federal businesses had been utilizing a Palantir product that would permit the Trump administration to merge their data, elevating considerations that the federal government would compile a grasp checklist of non-public data.
Davis Polk had represented the monetary advisers to Palantir in an preliminary public providing.
Powers despatched the column he meant to publish to a few regulation agency leaders in an e-mail reviewed by Law360. He wrote that if the regulation agency rejected his request to publish, he would love a written clarification of the rationale.
“As a substitute of any reply,” he informed the Parnas Perspective, “I obtained a knock on my door about 4 hours after the article was despatched to them.” He was fired instantly and given just a few minutes to pack his private belongings.
Powers views the Davis Polk publishing coverage as ambiguous. Punishing speech with no clear clarification preserves energy and silences attorneys who’re “the primary line of protection in a constitutional disaster,” he writes.
In his interview with the Parnas Perspective, Powers stated the regulation agency’s publishing coverage is “morally weak and poorly justified.” He believes enforcement of the coverage “compromises the integrity of the establishment and each legal professional in it.”
“This isn’t nearly one agency,” Powers wrote in his Substack article. “It’s about BigLaw: an trade more and more beholden to energy, the place employers are quietly deciding what their attorneys are allowed to say—not simply within the workplace, however of their lives past it. When sharing authorized information is handled as an issue and silence turns into the expectation, the hazard isn’t simply to attorneys who communicate up. It’s to the rule of regulation itself.”
Powers, a Harvard regulation graduate, was a tax affiliate who was employed at Davis Polk in October 2023.
Davis Polk is declining to remark, a spokesperson informed the ABA Journal.
Write a letter to the editor, share a narrative tip or replace, or report an error.
