Some relationships are usually not outlined by longevity or labels, however by the emotional refuge they provide throughout life’s darkest phases.
When Raj Babbar and Rekha’s paths crossed, each had been navigating private grief — he, mourning the lack of Smita Patil; she, rising from the shadows of a long-standing relationship. Their connection, whereas temporary, was a supply of quiet consolation, solid on a basis of mutual understanding and emotional vulnerability.
Talking years later, Raj Babbar mirrored on that point with exceptional readability. “Sure, our relationship helped me in a approach. We drifted collectively due to sure circumstances. At the moment, Rekha had damaged off from a long-standing relationship. She needed to get away from it. I used to be in an analogous scenario,” he mentioned in an outdated interview in line with Occasions of India, explaining how their companionship grew amidst shared sorrow. “On the similar time, we had been additionally working collectively, we clung to one another for emotional assist. We tried to grasp one another’s issues. One doesn’t neglect such a relationship very simply. Although we aren’t collectively as we speak, we nonetheless have fond recollections of these particular moments.”
Story continues under this advert
Is it frequent for individuals to bond romantically whereas dealing with grief or emotional loss, and might such relationships present real therapeutic?
Psychologist Raashi Gurnani tells indianexpress.com, “When two individuals discover themselves navigating by grief, heartbreak, or emotional transitions, it’s not unusual for a romantic connection to kind. In psychology, that is usually seen as a coping mechanism — individuals instinctively search consolation, understanding, and emotional security in those that mirror their present frame of mind. When Raj Babbar spoke of his bond with Rekha, it appeared to stem from a shared emotional void, a have to be understood with out rationalization.”
Movie star Rekha and Raj Babbar in AGAR TUM NA HOTE. (Supply: Categorical archive picture)
In such moments, she notes that vulnerability acts as a bridge, stripping away superficial layers and permitting people to attach on a deeper, extra real degree. “These relationships, although born in fragility, can generally supply real therapeutic. They provide a way of companionship throughout emotionally turbulent instances, and that mutual presence might be extremely grounding.”
How do emotionally weak relationships differ from those who start in additional secure phases of life?
Emotionally weak relationships usually carry a special weight than these fashioned in emotionally secure intervals, notes Gurnani, including that there’s a “heightened depth” in such connections. She mentions, “They have a tendency to evolve rapidly, as a result of each people are craving to really feel complete once more, usually hoping the opposite particular person will fill the emotional void they’re carrying. Whereas this will really feel profound, it could additionally create dependency or blur boundaries. Stability, alternatively, permits for extra aware, balanced like to develop — the place attraction is commonly primarily based on compatibility fairly than emotional want. Relationships born from trauma might need an exquisite starting, however sustaining them long-term requires self-awareness and therapeutic exterior the bond too.”
