Robinhood filed swimsuit towards Massachusetts regulators on Monday, claiming the state couldn’t take into account its “occasion contracts” to be unlawful sports-betting. The monetary companies firm argued that the follow is preempted by federal legislation and that the Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC) has “unique jurisdiction” over transactions involving occasion contracts. The swimsuit names Massachusetts Lawyer Normal Andrea Pleasure Campbell, the Massachusetts Gaming Fee and a number of of its commissioners as defendants.
Trending
- Meta Showcases New AI Glasses, VR Upgrades, at Connect 2025
- Brotherhood in Big Law: How Black Male Attorneys in D.C. Built Their Own Network
- Inside the Dual Lawsuits Threatening to Unravel Group Black
- Govardhan Puja 2025 Date, Puja Time, Shubh Muhurat, Significance, Importance, Mantra and When is Govardhan Puja
- Robinhood Counters State’s Lawsuit Over Sports-Betting Statute
- Why Executives Should Stop Ignoring Brain Fog and Start Finding Root-Cause Clarity
- Reddit is Becoming a Key Consideration for Marketers
- Showdown at TV Station Highlights Reputational Risks of Noncompetes
Thursday, September 18
Robinhood Counters State’s Lawsuit Over Sports-Betting Statute
