“We’re happy that the appellate court docket agreed with us that the Residents Participation Act was meant as a defend for good religion participation within the political course of, and shouldn’t be weaponized to allow dangerous religion, politically motivated, and false allegations of wrongdoing towards our heroic lecturers freed from penalties,” Sheryl Weikal stated on behalf of the plaintiff.
Trending
- 5 Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me Before I Became a CEO
- How to Build a Side Hustle That Stands on Its Own — Without Burning Out
- Trainer hails Farhan Akhtar’s commitment, says actor took on ‘one of the most demanding transformations in Bollywood history’ for Toofan | Fitness News
- Build a High-Converting Product Launch Funnel Instead
- Why Your Company Needs Flexible Capital (and How to Get It)
- Rail training launched for ex-Tata steelworkers
- A day in the life of President Droupadi Murmu, which includes a 6 AM walk through Amrit Udyan | Lifestyle News
- All about Valsalva maneuver, the technique that can help protect your ears during air travel, underwater diving | Health News
Saturday, July 5
State Appellate Court Reinstates Teacher's Lawsuit Over Political Divide on Social Media
